Psicothema was founded in Asturias (northern Spain) in 1989, and is published jointly by the Psychology Faculty of the University of Oviedo and the Psychological Association of the Principality of Asturias (Colegio Oficial de Psicología del Principado de Asturias).
We currently publish four issues per year, which accounts for some 100 articles annually. We admit work from both the basic and applied research fields, and from all areas of Psychology, all manuscripts being anonymously reviewed prior to publication.
Psicothema was founded in Asturias (northern Spain) in 1989, and is published by the Psychology Association of the Principality of Asturias (Colegio Oficial de Psicología del Principado de Asturias). We currently publish four issues per year.
We accept work from both the basic and applied research fields, and from all areas of Psychology, all manuscripts being anonymously reviewed prior to publication.
Psicothema is included in the most important national and international databases, notably Psychological Abstracts, Current Contents and MEDLINE/Index Medicus; it is also on the Impact Factor lists drawn up by the prestigious Institute for Scientific Information. Looking to the future, Psicothema will continue to be open to any psychological approach or perspective backed up by the strength of its data and arguments, and to welcome any author capable of convincing our reviewers that their manuscript meets the standards of quality we demand.
Psicothema is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to any user or institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, as long as reference to the original source is made. For content coverage outside of our network, links to the Psicothema website are preferred.
We believe that a decisive commitment to quality is the best guarantee for our readers, whose suggestions will always be welcome.
To date, no studies have shown validity evidence of a scale that measures the methodological quality of studies based on observational methodology (SBOM). This study presents validity evidence of the Methodological Quality Scale for Studies based on Observational Methodology (MQSOM) based on its internal structure.
To date, no studies have shown validity evidence of a scale that measures the methodological quality of studies based on observational methodology (SBOM). This study presents validity evidence of the Methodological Quality Scale for Studies based on Observational Methodology (MQSOM) based on its internal structure.
READ MORE
Suicide is a preventable public health and social problem. Suicidal behavior is a complex and multifactorial phenomenon whose characterization, assessment, prevention, intervention, and postvention require a comprehensive approach focused on the meaning in a person’s life and ttheir suffering in their biographical, social and cultural context.
Suicide is a preventable public health and social problem. Suicidal behavior is a complex and multifactorial
phenomenon whose characterization, assessment, prevention, intervention, and postvention require a comprehensive
approach focused on the meaning in a person’s life and ttheir suffering in their biographical, social and cultural context.
It is an extraordinarily variable phenomenon over time and highly dependent on contextual elements.
READ MORE
Previous studies have identified the association between classroom social status and bullying victimization, but it remains unclear how different victimization trajectories relate separately to social status dimensions: preference (acceptance and rejection) and popularity (popular and unpopular), and whether there are differences between victimization trajectory groups.
Previous studies have identified the association between classroom social status and bullying victimization, but it remains unclear how different victimization trajectories relate separately to social status dimensions: preference (acceptance and rejection) and popularity (popular and unpopular), and whether there are differences between victimization trajectory groups. This study assumed a longitudinal approach to explore these research questions. READ MORE
SPANISH
ENGLISH
